Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓÇÁ¶õÆ® º¸Ã¶¼öº¹¹°¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÀÎÁ¢Ä¡°£ Á¢ÃË°­µµÀÇ Æò°¡

Evaluation of Tightness of Proximal tooth Contact on Implant Prostheses

±è»óÇÊ, ¿À»óÈ£, Á¤ÀçÇö, °­µ¿¿Ï,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è»óÇÊ ( Kim Sang-Pil ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¿À»óÈ£ ( Oh Sang-Ho ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¤ÀçÇö ( Jeong Jae-Hyeon ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
°­µ¿¿Ï ( kang Dong-Wan ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ¾ÈÁ¤ ½Ã, ÀÓÇÁ¶õÆ® º¸Ã¶¹°°ú ÀÚ¿¬Ä¡ »çÀÌÀÇ ÀÎÁ¢Ä¡°£ Á¢ÃË°­µµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÁÂÃø »ó¾Ç ¶Ç´Â ÇÏ¾Ç Á¦2´ë±¸Ä¡¿¡ ´Üµ¶À¸·Î ÀÓÇÁ¶õÆ®°¡ ½Ä¸³µÇ¾î º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÌ ÀåÂøµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â 20¸íÀÇ ÇÇÇèÀÚ¸¦ ÀÓÇÁ¶õÆ® ±ºÀ¸·Î, ÁÂÃø »óÇÏ¾Ç Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡¿Í Á¦2´ë±¸Ä¡ »çÀÌÀÇ ÀÎÁ¢ºÎÀ§¿¡ ¼öº¹¹°ÀÌ ¾ø´Â 10¸íÀÇ ÇÇÇèÀÚ¸¦ ´ëÁ¶±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾î ±³ÇÕ·ÂÀÌ ÀÛ¿ëÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â ¾ÈÁ¤»óÅ¿¡¼­ ÀÎÁ¢Ä¡°£ Á¢ÃË°­µµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÚ¿¬Ä¡ »çÀÌÀÇ ÀÎÁ¢Ä¡°£ Á¢ÃË°­µµ°¡ Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, ƯÈ÷ ÇϾǿ¡¼­´Â Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ÀÓÇÁ¶õÆ® º¸Ã¶¹°¿¡ À־ ÀÎÁ¢Ä¡°£ Á¢ÃËÀ» Á» ´õ °­ÇÏ°Ô ºÎ¿©ÇÒ ÇÊ¿ä°¡ ÀÖÀ½ÀÌ ½Ã»çµÇ¾ú°í ¶ÇÇÑ ÀÚ¿¬Ä¡¾Æ¿Í ÀÓÇÁ¶õÆ® º¸Ã¶¹°»çÀÌÀÇ °æ½ÃÀû º¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÎÁ¢Á¢ÃË°­µµÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÒ ÇÊ¿ä°¡ ÀÖÀ½ÀÌ ½Ã»çµÇ¾ú´Ù.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the tightness of proximal tooth contact(TPTC) using a novel device at rest state on implant prostheses. Ten healthy young adults with class I normal occlusion consented to participate in the study and twenty patients were restored with a total 20 single-implant crowns in the left maxillary and mandibular second molars for 10 single-implant crowns, respectively. Test area were divided by 4 groups. UM describes the contact between the upper natural left first molar and natural second molar; LM the contact between the lower natural left first molar and natural second molar; IUM the contact between the upper natural left first molar and implant second molar and ILM the contact between the lower natural left first molar and implant second molar. The TPTC was measured at rest state in each area. The mean TPTC of the UM, LM, IUM and ILM was 1.48(¡¾0.44) N, 1.78(¡¾0.40) N, 1.14(¡¾0.37) N and 1.30(¡¾0.32) N respectively. These results indicate that the TPTC was less between natural tooth and implant prosthesis than between natural teeth.

Å°¿öµå

ÀÎÁ¢Ä¡°£Á¢ÃË;ÀÓÇÁ¶õÆ®
Implant;Proximal contact

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI